Christmas Wishlist pt. 1: Understandable State Standards

Posted by : Andrew Shores | Tuesday, December 15, 2009 | Published in

During this Christmas season I am sharing my wishlist for math education. I hope it brings warmth to your heart and a smile to your face.

This year, math departments across Indiana are taking a look at their curriculum and choosing new textbooks to use. The math department at my school has been going over the state standards (pdf) and attempting to put them into a framework for teaching. As we have been working on this, I have repeatedly been frustrated by the lack of clarity and the redundancy of the state standards.

As an example, the Indiana Algebra 2 standard 5.2 says students should be able to
"add, subtract, multiply, divide, reduce and evaluate rational expressions with polynomial denominators," and "simplify rational expressions, including expressions with negative exponents in the denominator."
Unfortunately, that one standard covers more than an entire chapter of my algebra 2 book. So does the state expect students to be able to answer all of the types of problems that my book presents? There are dozens of problem types that fall under this massive umbrella.

Thankfully, the state provides an example. Their example is

 \frac{x^2 -4}{x^5} \div \frac {x^3- 8}{x^8}.

This causes new problems. Specifically, this is a very simple type of problem compared to many that are in the textbook. Is this problem indicative of the difficulty of the problems that the state feels is appropriate for this class? If so, I can throw out about 3/4 of my entire book based on the examples the state provides for the other standards.

Of course, since most of the standards are so broad and the examples they provide are so narrow, I am sure I would be leaving out plenty of important topics if I followed this plan.

Sometimes, when I am seeking clarity on the standards, I look back at the algebra 1 standards to get an idea of the progression of learning the state is seeking. In this case, however, the standard over the same topic in algebra 1 (6.2) is nearly identical to the standard in algebra 2. In fact, they use the same example problem for the algebra 1 and algebra 2 standard.

I am very confused.

So, for Christmas, I would like a clear set of standards (with plenty of examples) so that I know what I should be teaching my students.

Christmas Wishlist: Introduction

Posted by : Andrew Shores | Saturday, December 05, 2009 | Published in

Every year since I was little I would create a wishlist of things that I wanted for Christmas. I always included at least a couple of "big ticket" items on the list, such as "World Peace" or "One million dollars" or "Cubs winning the world series."

In the spirit of those lists, the next several posts will include the items I have on my current wishlist for education. Stay tuned!



Doing Mathematics

Posted by : Andrew Shores | Sunday, November 01, 2009 | Published in

[Ignoring the pink elephant in the room: how long it has been since I posted. . . just going to glide right by that.]

So what has been on my academic mind recently has been how to get the students to do more math. I'm not talking about practice problems that come from the textbook or even from my mind. I'm not talking about problems that are similar to those on standardized tests or my own assessments.

What I am thinking of is something that is closer to what mathematicians actually do. I'm vague on the details right now because I'm not exactly sure about them, but here is roughly what I'm thinking. Mathematicians don't typically work practice problems over and over again, but are instead involved in one (or more) of the following activities:
  • Exploring the properties of some numeric/algebraic/etc pattern.
  • Making a generalization about a pattern they see.
  • Proving a conjecture they have made.
  • Modeling the world around them with equations and data sets in order to answer some sort of question about the world.
  • Researching the methods/work of other mathematicians.
So, why aren't my students doing more of this? Granted, they almost certainly would be going over ground already covered by previous mathematicians, but there is certainly value in finding your own way through something sometimes.

Now I just have to find a way to implement this idea and I need a long list of actual activities that students can do. Any thoughts, oh wise internet world?

Creating disciples

Posted by : Andrew Shores | Monday, August 10, 2009 | Published in

Dallas Willard on creating disciples: "We [should] intend to make disciples and let converts 'happen,' rather than intending to make converts and letting disciples 'happen.' " Taken from The Divine Conspiracy.

What do you think of that?

Wikipedia linkage

Posted by : Andrew Shores | Sunday, August 09, 2009 | Published in

So for the last couple of days my brother has been visiting. It is always fun when he comes to Indiana. We stayed up late most nights (well, late for me, kind of average for him). We had a good time discussing all the usual topics: movies, music, life, politics, etc.

However, he introduced me to a new "game" that he plays with him self. It is basically a solitaire version of 6 degrees of separation using wikipedia. Here are the basic rules:
  1. Pick a topic which you would like to read about on wikipedia.
  2. Start at the wikipedia homepage.
  3. Only use the links available to you (don't use the search feature) in order to get from the homepage to the article you are looking for while passing through as few intermediate articles as possible.
It is a natural outlet for curiosity since you can read some of the intermediate pages that you land on. It is also a fun way to see the way that everything is connected.

Hopefully it is clear that neither my brother nor I exclusively use this method of looking stuff up on wikipedia, but it is an educational way to pass a half hour.